Checkpoint Full Disk Encryption
We use Checkpoint here, and are currently in the process of planning a major from the standalone client to the full console version. They had some issues in the past with the OS X and Windows versions not being in sync, but with the latest release E80 release, the clients are identical. Nfs Carbon Savegame Editor For Pc Games. There are still a few gaps, such as not supporting Fusion drives, but overall, things have been great.
Commercial Series Customer Programming Software Motorola Gp there. Deployment has been simple: We create a composer package that pushes the installer and our installation profile onto the client, and then call a script to run through the pkg installer. It has worked flawlessly for us.
As far as management goes, the reason we are moving to the console version is to have better reporting. Currently, the encryption files are written to a File share, and that is all the logging we get. We use the JSS' EA to get a more up to date picture, but with the Console version, it allows for more 'real-time' updates (1-2 minutes).
Encryption Troubleshooting - Shows users and computers that might require troubleshooting for disk encryption. You can see the step of the Full Disk Encryption. Jul 22, 2013 - A Jamf Nation discussion about [Request for feedback] Check Point Full Disk Encryption.
The stability has been great for us. We have found a few iMacs that shipped to us with bad blocks/sectors that were not picked up by any of our HD diagnostics. When we have reached out to support, they have been quick to respond. Like I said above, I definitely suggest the web chat as the best option. Reliability has been pretty good. We saw an uptick in 'black screens' that leave the machines in an un-bootable state, but that is more due to the fact that these drives have been encrypted for 4-5 years, and are used 24/7. As far as performance goes, we have noticed that with Checkpoint we are getting about a 1-2% performance hit over FileVault, but nothing that has cause major issues.
We are just wrapping up a proof of concept with Checkpoint for Mac and of the options out there I'd say it is by far the best. Especially if you integrate with AD.
The encryption is pretty quick with low overhead after the fact. Deployment is really easy and its in their roadmap to be able to build Mac packages from the console. The two biggest sells for me on the product are the preboot single sign on THAT WORKS and the ability of our techs to mount the filesystem while booted from one of our emergency drives.
This gives it parity with FileVault, which we can not deploy in our environment. I've been testing it for about a month if you have any specific questions. @iJake That is 100% true. There are some things you can do to mitigate this, using profiles to lock down the 'Security & Privacy' preference pane comes to mind. But, in the end, you are correct.
If someone has an administrative account, that is also authorized to unlock the drive, and wants to decrypt the drive, they can. That said, any of the other solutions allow an administrative account that is authorized to unlock the drive to access, and copy data off of, the encrypted drive - which is the root of what you're trying to prevent. There is a lot of trust/responsibility given to people that have administrative rights to a machine, this is no different. I treat this as an issue with breaking corporate policy. Set up a smart group for machines that are not encrypted and have it mail you on group change. If someone decrypts their machine, give them a very firm warning and re-encrypt the drive. If it happens again, forward the email to your security team or HR and let them discuss the employee's continued future at the company. Dylan Dog 300 Cbr Download.
We didn't Symantec because If I'm remember correctly it has the serious design flaw of not being able to have the machine shut down during initial encryption. It would break the encryption. Symantec bought PGP, so if you're familiar with that then its what it is. Aside from CheckPoint and FileVault we tested Credant and McAfee. The Credant had some issues when I first tested it but after those were cleared up it worked pretty well. It just doesn't offer pre boot and that was a no go for me. We use Credant file encryption on our PCs and are quite experienced with it.
Its definitely the best option if you want the absolute least change for your customers. McAfee is just not ready on the Mac. It can't work with local users for pre boot but rather they HAVE to be AD. That eliminates any local admin account you might use.